BLOOM
TAXONOMY????
Approximately
all educators have been, at some point, exposed to Bloom’s Taxonomy when
developing objectives. And, while not all developers may use the
taxonomy as guide in developing educational succession and range,
the majority feel it is helpful in focusing on learner outcomes
which not only address low order cognitive level but higher level
as well . (Muzio, et. al., 2001) suggests the following basis at the back
the use of Bloom’s taxonomy:
·
Bloom’s terms are comparatively
easy to understand by beginner developers with little, if no, experience
of instructional plan.
·
A number of synonyms are able to be
given for each of Bloom’s terms. This is helpful when developing verbs
specifying learner outcomes.
Bloom’s taxonomy helpout in
development of Instructional objectives instrumented by Table of specification
.This understanding was supported by comments made byBloom and his colleagues
(1956) allthrough the Handbook.
On page 18, for example, flaey
wrote:
"We are of
the opinion that although the objectives
and test materials and techniques may be specified in
an almost unlimited number of ways, the student behaviors
involved in these objectives can be
represented by a relatively small number
of classes. Therefore, this taxonomy is designed to
be a classification of the student behaviors which
represent the
intended outcomes of the
educational process." (p. 18).
According to Bloom
“The goals of a teaching unit, may
find that they all fall within the taxonomy category
of recalling or remembering knowledge. Looking
at the taxonomy categories may suggest
[that the teacher] could include some goals dealing with the
application of this knowledge and with the analysis of the situations in
which the knowledge is used” (Bloom et al.,
1956,p. 2)
Illustrated
by Author
In
the 1990's a former student student of Bloom's named Lorin Anderson revisited
and revised the taxonomy.
No comments :
Post a Comment